![6 Takeaways From The Prague Chess Festival](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/news/582908.be281c14.668x375o.0b088d5c43e6@2x.jpeg)
6 Takeaways From The Prague Chess Festival
The Prague Chess Festival was a joy for chess fans in an otherwise quiet month for top chess. The Masters tournament was won by 16-year-old wunderkind GM Alireza Firouzja. GM Jorden van Foreest clinched the Challengers as both sections provided great games and plenty of drama.
During the Prague Chess Festival, Chess.com brought daily coverage with brief news recaps. In this more in-depth report on the tournament, we look more closely at the different storylines and provide a thorough GM analysis of five games.
1. Firouzja coming of age
"He has amazing potential," was GM Boris Gelfand's comment on Firouzja during the round six live broadcast, several days before the tournament was over.
The big story of the 2020 Prague Chess Festival is, of course, Firouzja's first major tournament victory. Whether it was a super tournament or not—this author likes to have at least one grandmaster from the top 10 to call it that—the result was very impressive for a 16-year-old. The winner wasn't even a grandmaster two years ago.
Firouzja has been showing his blitz and rapid skills online and over the board for a while, and his second place in 2019 at the World Rapid Championship showed his prowess in that time control as well.
In classical chess, the numbers also speak. After GM Wei Yi, for whom he was a last-minute replacement in Prague, Firouzja is the youngest player ever to reach a rating of 2700. Currently at 2726, he is the number one junior (now that Wei is too old). His debut in the highest group of Wijk aan Zee last month was very fine as well: a 50 percent score in a strong field.
Alireza Firouzja reached Prague and is ready for the battles! #chess #picf2020 pic.twitter.com/rZKiHML4xb
— Prague Chess Festival (@PragueChess) February 12, 2020
But winning a tournament is something special. It shows something else, besides his incredible talent: that he's got the nerves to win a playoff. Sure, he ended up winning a tournament with only a plus-one score in the classical games (and GM Vidit Gujrathi was the psychological underdog after his unfortunate last two rounds), but you still have to perform.
Let's first look at his win in the third round against GM Pentala Harikrishna, a game this author already compared to some of GM Bobby Fischer's wins in the Ruy Lopez. After the Indian grandmaster made a strategic error in the opening, he was outplayed beautifully on a board full of minor pieces.
Firouzja's second win in the tournament, against GM Jan-Krzysztof Duda, won the Chess.com Brilliancy Prize that we introduced in our final wrap-up article on the Cairns Cup. The prize is awarded 50 percent by the choice of the content team, and 50 percent by the Chess.com members (taken from the poll on our site).
As simple as it may sound, a big part of winning at chess is about not losing. It shouldn't be forgotten that GM David Anton, who had promoted from the Challengers last year, had a big chance of winning this tournament as well. Firouzja not losing their head-to-head match was crucial.
Despite his final-round exchange sacrifice on move 25 that showed knowledge of the classics, Firouzja was clearly lost at some point in his King's Indian against Anton. However, the pressure toward the white king was apparent and Firouzja grabbed the first tactical opportunity that he was given.
This way, no less than five players finished on plus one. Besides Vidit and Firouzja, those were Duda, Anton, and GM Sam Shankland. However, only the top two players on Sonneborn-Berger were invited to play the playoff.
Prague Masters | Final Standings
# | Fed | Name | Rtg | Perf | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | ||
1 | Vidit Gujrathi | 2721 | 2744 | 1 | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | ½ | 5.0/9 | 22.5 | ||
2 | Alireza Firouzja | 2726 | 2743 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 5.0/9 | 22.25 | ||
3 | Jan-Krzysztof Duda | 2755 | 2741 | 1 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 5.0/9 | 22 | ||
4 | David Anton Guijarro | 2697 | 2747 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | 5.0/9 | 21.25 | ||
5 | Sam Shankland | 2683 | 2748 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 5.0/9 | 21.25 | ||
6 | Nikita Vitiugov | 2731 | 2705 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 4.5/9 | 20.25 | ||
7 | Pentala Harikrishna | 2713 | 2707 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 4.5/9 | 19.75 | ||
8 | Markus Ragger | 2670 | 2672 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 4.0/9 | 18 | ||
9 | David Navara | 2717 | 2668 | 1 | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | 4.0/9 | 17.25 | ||
10 | Nils Grandelius | 2659 | 2593 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | 3.0/9 |
Here's a closer look at the first tiebreak game, which was a very interesting and sharp fight in which Vidit also played well. However, with little time on the clock, he suddenly found himself in a mating net.
2. Jorden makes a jump
Van Foreest's start of 2020 has gone exceptionally well. His fourth place in Wijk aan Zee with 7/13 was good for a 2774 performance rating. This increased his rating from 2644 to 2667, and for the first time, he entered the world's top 100, at spot 69.
Then came Prague, where he started slowly with five draws but finished strongly with 3.5/4. This time his performance rating was 2696, and he won four more Elo points.
![Jorden van Foreest Prague Challengers](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/images_users/tiny_mce/PeterDoggers/phpzgU8bm.jpeg)
No rest for the wicked: Two days later he was already in Germany to play two games in the Bundesliga for his team SG Solingen. He won both, gaining another 7.5 points and so his March rating is set to be 2678. He could become the fourth 2700 player in Dutch chess history, after GM Loek van Wely, GM Ivan Sokolov and, of course, GM Anish Giri.
In the final round, van Foreest defeated early tournament leader and 13-time Icelandic champion GM Hannes Stefansson, who was just helpless throughout the second half of the game.
![Jorden van Foreest wins Prague Challengers](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/images_users/tiny_mce/PeterDoggers/phpSrUAWu.jpeg)
Prague Challengers | Final Standings
# | Fed | Name | Rtg | Perf | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 0 | ||
1 | Jorden van Foreest | 2667 | 2696 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 1 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 6.0/9 | |||
2 | Nijat Abasov | 2670 | 2655 | ½ | 1 | 0 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 5.5/9 | 23.75 | ||
3 | Andrey Esipenko | 2654 | 2656 | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 1 | 5.5/9 | 22.5 | ||
4 | Mateusz Bartel | 2639 | 2619 | ½ | 1 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | 5.0/9 | 21.5 | ||
5 | Kacper Piorun | 2611 | 2621 | ½ | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | 5.0/9 | 20.75 | ||
6 | Hannes Stefansson | 2529 | 2630 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5.0/9 | 18.75 | ||
7 | Nguyen Thai Dai Van | 2560 | 2588 | 0 | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | ½ | 1 | ½ | ½ | 4.5/9 | |||
8 | Lukas Cernousek | 2442 | 2522 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | 1 | 3.5/9 | |||
9 | Jan Krejci | 2559 | 2423 | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | ½ | 0 | ½ | ½ | 0 | 2.5/9 | 12 | ||
10 | Tadeas Kriebel | 2524 | 2427 | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 0 | ½ | 0 | 1 | 2.5/9 | 10.25 |
3. Don't always trust the engine
The tournament might have given Vidit a few sleepless nights. With one round to go, he was as close as one can get to tournament victory!
In round eight, the 25-year-old Indian GM had quickly reached a winning position against GM David Navara. The local hero wasn't having a great tournament and made some mistakes early in the game. With Vidit's magnet combination 15.Bxf7+ and 16.e6, Navara's king was dragged into the open and the engine was giving plus two for White. This was curtains, right?
However, the casual fan might be missing some important factors here. For starters, Vidit had spent more than an hour on the clock reaching this position. Besides, there was one clear problem with playing the remainder: time and again, White had plenty of options that looked strong.
![Vidit vs Navara Prague](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/news/581992.cf3fa43d.668x375o.4b53ce45a70f@2x.jpeg)
After spending 17 minutes on his 17th move and another 6.5 on his 19th, Vidit had about half an hour left for moves 20 to 40. He decided to go for a promising endgame, which was a mistake according to the engine, who wanted to continue playing for the attack.
But was it a mistake? Vidit was leading the tournament by a point, he just sacrificed a piece and saw a risk-free endgame. It was a sensible decision, more or less confirmed by the fact that soon he was completely winning again.
However, with four seconds on the clock, he forgot to give a rook check, and everything was different after that. Navara was going to draw this! No, worse: Navara even ended up winning the game.
Or, what about GM Nikita Vitiugov's endgame with Duda? It was a tablebase win, but also here, things were much more complicated than they seemed.
Chess is always more difficult than it looks.
Being in the worst shape for years, I was anyway in couple of moves from winning the tournament. Well, there is a room to progress. #picf2020
— Nikita Vitiugov (@N_Vitiugov) February 21, 2020
4. Gotta keep believin'
Shankland was the other player finishing on plus one, but he remained somewhat in the background. However, the result was important to him personally, and some kind of a moral victory that closed off a bad phase in his life.
On Facebook, and cross-posted as a blog on Chess.com, he writes that he "finally got [his] life back on track," having gone through "the worst phase of [his] adult life."
Last year he narrowly missed out on playing in the FIDE Grand Prix, saw both his parents having "major health scares" and then "a thick glass shard of a broken Pyrex container slashed through the flexor tendons of [his] left hand, leaving [him] disabled, in pain, and sleeping poorly for two months even after surgery."
![Sam Shankland Prague Masters 2020](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/images_users/tiny_mce/PeterDoggers/phpRYpMNO.jpeg)
But Shankland now feels he is back:
"2019 broke my heart. But it's a new year now. (...) I finally played a decent event where I showed some degree of the strength I know I am capable of. My tiebreak math didn't work out, but I'm still counting this as a tournament victory, and more importantly, as a personal victory. I can only hope the same positive trend continues throughout the rest of the year."
Here's Shankland's win from the last round:
5. A mixed field works
During the Prague Chess Festival, the news came out that all invited players of the Grand Chess Tour had accepted their invitation. While lots of fans will be looking forward to another series of tournaments where the top grandmasters of the world are facing each other, there were also fans lamenting the fact that we'll be seeing the same faces once again.
![Round 7 Prague Chess Masters](https://images.chesscomfiles.com/uploads/v1/images_users/tiny_mce/PeterDoggers/phpkMdPBl.jpeg)
One of the major attractions of the Tata Steel Chess Tournament has always been the diverse field (especially in the Challengers group), and Prague copying this format can only be applauded. Giving local talents the opportunity to face strong international grandmasters is a worthy goal for an event, and having players of different ages and levels, in general, leads to very interesting events to follow.
6. The organizers know what they're doing
The tournament in Prague was a festival in the true sense of the word. Whereas most fans only followed the Masters and Challengers tournaments, there was in fact a large number of side events that made this event truly special.
Besides a Futures group (with promising youngsters), an open, a rapid and a blitz tournament, there was also an exhibition of the international tournament held in Prague in 1990, a lecture by the director of the Vaclav Havel Library and the Czech grandmaster Lubomir Kavalek, a children's day, a clock simul by GM Boris Gelfand and a film festival.
Réunion with participants and organisers of the legendary tournament in Prague 1990, with the famous game Havel-Kok explained (again) by Lubosh Kavalek. pic.twitter.com/8n1TX8bGkd
— Jeroen Van Den Berg (@Jvdbergchess) February 15, 2020
Children's Day afoot during the rest day of #picf2020 with TV Nova Sports reporter and #chess ambassador Inna Puhajková pic.twitter.com/kfxZnk8rax
— Prague Chess Festival (@PragueChess) February 17, 2020
Clock #chess simul Boris Gelfand vs The Futures was held on the rest day in Aero Cinema. Check out the wonderful shots made by Petr Vrabec ➡️https://t.co/8hwdCY5t46 #picf2020 pic.twitter.com/BxZIPAlWOB
— Prague Chess Festival (@PragueChess) February 19, 2020
On top of that, the Prague organizers re-instated some traditions that are not even kept in Wijk aan Zee anymore: a daily prize for the best game played in the previous round, and a daily chess puzzle presented by IM Yochanan Afek.
It's wonderful to see that the love for the game of chess still creates new amazing festivals (this was only the second edition) that can be enjoyed by fans of all ages.
The Prague Chess Festival had a prize fund of 44,000 euros ($48,000) and ran February 12-21 in Hotel Don Giovanni in Prague, Czech Republic. Below you can find our news recaps.
Previous reports:
- Firouzja Wins Prague Chess Festival Masters
- Prague Chess Festival R8: Vidit Loses Won Game, Still Leads
- Prague Chess Festival R7: Firouzja Wins Again, Shankland Scores 1st
- Prague Chess Festival R5: Vidit Beats Firouzja, Increases Lead
- Prague Chess Festival R3: Vidit Grabs The Lead
- Prague Chess Festival R1: Favorites Strike
- 2nd Prague Chess Festival: The Czech Wijk aan Zee?