im 9 and im 920 so maybe 1000
What should a 10-11 year old's rating be?
Sort:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
SujanShadrak wrote:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
SujanShadrak wrote:
ya i know its not that good.
Then why did you ask?
shut up its not funny
Didn't say it was.
LOL
SujanShadrak wrote:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
SujanShadrak wrote:
ghost_of_pushwood wrote:
SujanShadrak wrote:
ya i know its not that good.
Then why did you ask?
shut up its not funny
Didn't say it was.
LOL
Beware, even I cannot fight his trolling powers.
now im 1300
and im nearly 10
Sep 5, 2019
0
#107
Worked at an international chess camp for years. We had seven year olds that still wet their pants, and missed their mommies--but they could take many of us to pieces, across the board.
lol
lol
Apr 20, 2020
0
#110
I am the best 11 year old in Texas, 87th best of all in Texas, and 7th in the US for my age, and I am 2149
1e4_1-O wrote:
I am the best 11 year old in Texas, 87th best of all in Texas, and 7th in the US for my age, and I am 2149
Wowwwwwwww, Your super good, I'm 11 and I'm 1570 or something.
Apr 20, 2020
0
#115
1e4_1-O wrote:
Wth
Getting to 3000 is easy, just use an engine.
Apr 21, 2020
0
#117
AndBell wrote:
For every year you wait to start playing chess subtract 100 points from 3000 and add your current rating divided by ten- that is the maximum rating you will ever be able to hit according to quantum mechanics and general relativity-
f(x) = 3000 - age * 100 + elo/10
I started at 36 years old and my current rating is 1080 so my maximum possible rating is -420.
This is the advantage of starting young in chess.
According to quantum mechanics and general relativity unified, there is no way that the aforementioned formula can be of correctness. The accurate formula, derived from superstring theory, loop quantum gravity and twistor theory unified is Lagrangian of the partial 4th order derivative of e^-x where x is one's age.
You’re really smart! I think age doesn’t say so much in chess. If you enjoy playing chess in your age, just play and enjoy with learning new knowledge about it!
Chess.com rankings are garbage.
If you're 1400 on chess. Com you're actually closer to 1800 or 1900 realistically. For example, I played Magnus Carlsen's chess app, and barely can beat age ten. I've seen Magnus himself lose to age 10, along with several other grandmasters.
Im not a grandmaster.... if you can beat age ten 5 times in a row, your rating is above 2000. I hope this cleared up ratings for everyone. Magnus was well above 2000 at age 10 in fide rankings. Just saying. Fix your ratings
chess. Com
Five years later and OP is at 1533....