‘Proof’ God exists

No hard feeling to the dude pls. I’m only sending this so other arguments like that don’t arise.

God absolutely exists.. I with #s shared to an atheist a very cool way, that, with them, I could prove Jesus was crucified on a cross, The Son Of God. Well, that he up there on that beam and wrists nailed to another beam made a cross. It was inside a McDonald's and he was rather puzzled and I hope his views on such regards absolutely opened to his spiritual benefit for Eternity.

I have read about this, and the pythagorean theorem was solved by those teenagers using trigonometry, previously thought impossible because the pythagorean theorem was essentially the basis of trigonometry. Proofs for the theorem have been known to ancient civilizations for thousands of years.

Read past the headline next time.

A simple way to prove His actuality is very easily capable alone with the name JESUS and #s.

Ok, last conversation before I get off the forums.

I compared the bible as it is now to the pre-teengaer time. I compared this paper to the teenager's finding.

Yes, it was a bad analogy. Your response is how I know you are trying to tear me down rather than understand my point. You read the paper and claimed to not understand it. You have not asked one question about the paper and yet you try to refute me. You don't even refute the paper anymore, you are just refuting me at this point.

What does arguing about the pythagorean theorem do about the points presented in the paper? If you don't understand, ask questions. I'm willing to have an open discussion, but when someone makes an argument without an aim, it's very hard to make the next step forward.

What is your aim here? Prove the paper wrong or to prove me wrong? I want your mind to be focused on proving what is wrong, no matter what it may be.

Just saying, if you look deep into any argument, you will almost always find one thing off.

But does it disprove the main point? Are yo being nit-picky or constructive?

And I make a typo in the LAST sentence.

Seeking and finding is gained understanding, therefore affirming the belief.

No. You defined faith.

Belief is faith and knowlege.

....then comes atoning

It's like physics, but harder, because there's no easy experiment to do.

this computer has no auto correct. ARG.

The paper doesn't require brains to understand, or really even patience. You don't need to understand the definitions or anything. It's fast paced and entertaining. I've printed out a copy and I like to re-read it sometimes when I'm bored.

I did kind of ask a question actually, I’m sorry that it wasn’t clearer, and based on your post above, I doubt you’re in the mood to answer it, but nevertheless I will ask again, and while it sounds stupid I think a lot of the people here are in the same boat.

How does all this prove the existence of God?

I am a believer, but mostly that paper seems to be trying to decode revelation and the beasts number. And I mean, the bible does say that someone who is wise (not me) should be the one to discover the meaning of the beasts number. But how is that related to Gods existence? I’m not trying to be rude, I’m genuinely curious as to how you would answer this.

I like the idea about central tendencies, and how the beast lines up with these, but again, this is a subject that the bible says you have to be wise to understand, and there’s a good chance that the meaning of the number is not this. There’s also a good chance that this is correct, because you (if you are the one who wrote it) or whoever did write it clearly is wise to discover this connection.

I’m writing this to show that I did read your paper and thought it was interesting. But how does it prove God exists? All I want to know.

repost

I left and I randomly got online. Well, imma dip. School’s starting.

New paper: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15RtUmexySj_8sQRkvo41HZsG5eEy2vk15vUKgqGHqhQ/edit