I played a Labyrinth 82 match in which 2 players resigned. Those 2 players then got stalemated, which resulted in their points being distributed equally to the 2 remaining players. In the end, I was winning both in pieces and points, but I stalemated my opponent (I could have avoided it and won, but that's not the point), which awarded them 20 points (I wasn't aware that that was the case), making them win the match.My question is, what is the reasoning of awarding the 20 points to a stalemated player just because they haven't resigned?I feel like it would make more sense that the points be distributed to the remaining players just like they do in case of: the stalemated player having resigned, insufficient material, threefold repetition, or the 50-move rule.Would like to know opinions about that.This is my first post on this website. I wasn't sure whether to post it here or in the Chess Variants forum.