Um.. I randomely decided to play the bot called Li with a rating of 2000, I knew I would probably not win (ever heard of a 500 winning vs a 2000? not me!) but I thought it would be a good experience. So here is the game:
(Again, it doesn't let me use my pgn if I annotate, idk why, I'm probably making some mistake [like not using brackets or something])
So I'll say the stuff here. And just in case ur wondering, I did use 4 takebacks and 1 hint or something, but I mean, it's Li, and Li is not as easy as Martin.
Ok, let's begin.
At move 13, idk why I didn't do cxd6, (or even cxb6, but I think the former one is slightly better)
65 ...Qc4+ ?? Right away I knew I had to take the queen. Only later I realized I shouldn't have. Yeah, it did say (in the analysis) that Qxc4+ is the best move, but then I would be stuck with a bishop and knight. I didn't think that it was bad because I knew that bishop+knight mate is possible, but I did not --absolutely not, or else I would not have done queen for queen-- know that bishop+knight is oh so hard. Nope, I'm not kidding, it's so hard that in the end, with move 119, I set up threefold repitition. Bam, draw. I hope the computer knew that "oh gosh this is getting so boring" and it wasn't just a coincidence.
Yeah, I was setting up a bishop+knight mate, but in the YT video about it, the guy was using the light squared bishop and was getting the king to h8 while I was trying to get him to h1. It became so confusing. XD
Well in the end, I'm proud of myself, cuz who knew that I could draw against Li.
P.S. And don't challenge me if you have a rating of 2000. You know that without takebacks+hint I would not have won. Lol.