Greetings all,
I'd like some insight or input on something I can change when it comes to my opening choices. Looking on the website openingtree and the lichess analytics tool, I found that against opponents above 1100 I have a 47% winning percentage when I play 1.d4.
The London has been my go-to opening for white for about a year and a half now, but I am finding it increasingly difficult to play as I increase in rating. I really like that it is not a complicated opening and that I don't need tons of theory for it. I'm aware that the London can be pretty passive, but it is also opening that strong masters play often.
I recently switched to 1.e4 on occasional games. On these games I only score 43%. That is not completely surprising of course as I have much less experience playing e4. For me, the biggest difficulty with e4 is vast number of openings I need to know. Do you strong e4 players just develop a repertoire against the Sicilian, French, Scandinavian, Caro-Kann, Ruy Lopez, and Petrov? This was one of the main reasons why I switched to 1.d4 in the first place.
Now on to my black openings, when facing 1.e4 (with the same parameters as before) I have a winning percentage of 69%!! Around the same time I started playing the London, I also began playing the Caro-Kann. This is my type of opening: solid, structural, simple.
Even when facing 1.d4 I have a winning percentage of 62%. I'm still trying to figure out a solid response to the queen's gambit setup and the London, but I usually go with a King's Indian or Nimzo-Indian. Any recommendations against d4 would be helpful.
In closing, a couple questions. Is it normal for people around my rating level (1350 blitz) to be better with the black pieces? Also, do you have any recommendations for playing with white? Things to learn in the London? Ways to learn e4 openings? I know there is a lot here, but thanks for reading!