Joan DuBois <JDuBois@uschess.org>
To:my_mail_hub@yahoo.com,Alex Dunne,contactlog
Jul 30 at 9:10 AM
Hi Mr. Parsons,
Thank you for your email. Any games related to US Chess Correspondence Chess need to go through our Correspondence Chess Director Alex Dunne regardless of whether you are playing through the mail; email; ICCF Webserver for our Walter Muir. We do not offer CC play on any other chess site.
Your email has been copied to CCD Alex Dunne so you may also hear from him on this.
Thanks again -
Joan DuBois
Affiliate Relations Associate
jdubois@uschess.org / 931 787 1234 ext 123
Tournament Life Announcement (TLA) / Advertising
tla@uschess.org
US Chess - PO Box 3967, Crossville, TN 38557
www.uschess.org
-----Original Message-----
From: U.S.Chess Web Inquiry <web-registration@uschess.org>
Sent: Saturday, July 28, 2018 1:49 PM
To: Joan DuBois <JDuBois@uschess.org>; Alex Dunne <cchess@uschess.org>; contactlog <contactlog@uschess.org>
Subject: Contact Form # 51644: Correspondence Chess
SUBMITTED TO WEB CONTACT PAGE
From: Christopher Scott Parsons 16693903 <my_mail_hub@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat 28 Jul 2018 1:48:37 pm CDT
Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/67.0.3396.99 Safari/537.36
Subject: Contact Form # 51644: Correspondence Chess
I was interested in playing correspondence chess with other USCF members, via the Chess.com site and US Chess club there, where there are already rated USCF games being played and monitored. I was wondering if it would be acceptable to use the site and submit the results the same way that the other online games are submitted for rating ? I thought I had read that email could perhaps be an acceptable alternative to snail mail, if the Chess.com site doesn't seem to be an acceptable alternative to snail mail. Could you please reply with all of the pertinent information to my email and also forward a copy to the US Chess club at Chess.com, if indeed this is an alternative means to play rated correspondence ? Thanks in advance for your time and consideration.
In conclusion, it appears that the USCF has made an exclusive contract to do business with ICCF, to do all correspondence on their site, which I think is a mistake on the part of the USCF, not only monetarily, but simply from a public relations standpoint.
Exclusive contracts such as their's, only serve to provoke the aggitation of their members or potential members. For me personally, it is too much in violation of anti-trust sentiments. It forces members to have to purchase a 2nd membership to another chess site, to use a service that shouldn't be relegated to anyone place. The USCF should have recognized this ahead of time and not appeared so desperate for revenue. In my opinion, Chess.com has a far superior website in terms of services offered and community of users. I am of the mindset that we members here and perhaps even potential members here, should consider a petition to both Chess.com and the USCF, to get an arrangement made to be able to play correspondence here. I already pay for a premium membership to both entities. I should haven't to pay even more to play rated correspondence online.
Don't even get me started about the allowable use of engines on ICCF...