I literally lost my rook and therefore material advantage, I resigned and yet still had 100 accuracy? I didn't even get much chance to develop.
You lost a rook and a pawn ...
But you also won two minor pieces.
You had an advantage.

I literally lost my rook and therefore material advantage, I resigned and yet still had 100 accuracy? I didn't even get much chance to develop.
You lost a rook and a pawn ...
But you also won two minor pieces.
You had an advantage.

but losing that rook put me at a huge disadvantage though? and it brought my king off the back rank.
I would not have resigned so quickly. Yes, you traded (not lost) a rook and most beginners would think trading the rook in this way to be losing the game, but it's just not so. He traded two minor pieces for a major piece and a pawn. I have won many games in this position and was always happy to make this trade. He has less pieces to coordinate an attack against your king, leaving you with the advantage. I'll try to find one of my games to show you. But my coach taught me very early on that we are happy to make this trade, so don't give up if you find yourself in this position. With accurate play and good piece coordination you will win this position 9 times out of 10.
I hope you find this helpful. As you can see I was able to quickly win back the rook with fairly accurate play and coordination from my pieces.
Good luck!
I literally lost my rook and therefore material advantage, I resigned and yet still had 100 accuracy? I didn't even get much chance to develop.
2 minor pieces are better than a rook and a pawn in most cases (unless it is an endgame where they are not coordinated or something). In some cases 2 minor pieces are better than a rook and 2 pawns even.
You were actually much better when you resigned the game.
Not only that he made this unfavorable exchange, he lost a lot of time developing his 2 minor pieces he just traded of for an undeveloped rook and a pawn.
Never resign this early, unless you have something important to do in real life. ![]()
but losing that rook put me at a huge disadvantage though? and it brought my king off the back rank.
I don't like to accuse people of trolling, but it's hard to think of another explanation for your comments. White took your rook, you took his bishop and knight. How does this put you at "a huge disadvantage? " As for you king being "off the back rank," what power is preventing you from putting it back on the back rank? In fact, you resigned in a position where you were much better
I literally lost my rook and therefore material advantage, I resigned and yet still had 100 accuracy? I didn't even get much chance to develop.
But you were trying to develop on each move and at the end, your opponent gave up two minor pieces for your rook and pawn, so you had to take it. You never made a bad move in this game, got good accuracy. Why you didn't get a random number, say somewhere between 90-99 accuracy over 100 would be a question as well. But you should be focusing more on learning the concepts and plans. Cheers. 😊⭐
Never resign unless 1) you know how to conclude the game as a win for the other side, and 2) you know the opponent knows how to convert the win.
Unless it is a friend or someone you have played several times before, you are not likely to ever know #2 in an online game.
As you were better in the position you resigned (in fact, arguably winning), there is no way you knew how White should have converted that position.
Therefore, your only blunder in that game was hitting the resign button (which, frankly, should have reduced your accuracy to 0 as it completely obliterates your 7 good moves prior to that).
I literally lost my rook and therefore material advantage, I resigned and yet still had 100 accuracy? I didn't even get much chance to develop.