A TALLY OF DATABASE-USERS & NON-USERS

Sort:
artfizz
USERS
NON-USERS

aabbccdd   adamWheatley ADK 

  AlecKeen  artfizz anaxagoras akiba  

Beelzebub666 Baseballfan BigAlex  Billium248 

  but  bunkerputt BrooksJ  

ChevalierMalFet Creg chrish 

 cirrus45   CzarWithinMoons

draco_alpine   Duffer1965   dwaxe  Dmytro  

ericmittens   Evil_Homer  exiledcanuck 

Foodle  flamencowizard  

Gonnosuke   GeertM

 hondoham    

  ih8sens 

johnjacobson  jonnyjupiter   JYaasn

KillaBeez

lithium11 

mxdplay4   MindWars MM78

Marshal_Dillon

mauerblume

meserole

MonsterCat

MrWizard

Michelangelooo

MasterPatzer

marn0

Nimzo33  normajeanyates  nickel1356

  Narz

OdessaChess  onehandgann 

  ozzie_c_cobblepot  

phishcake5 PerfectGent     psihrishi 

RyanMK    rpann4321  Ray_Brooks

 Sharukin  subtext  SatDiver  streetfighter

TimMoroney The_Pitts    Tycho

 TheAOD  tr8drboi 

 uritbon  

 vsarun 

wormrose   wormstar 

xMenace  

Zug  

4268N8703W  

amateurograpy   Am3692   alec94x  

bgianis BillyIdle  bruhudson   Bolla

chqm8  caliche616  chessdadx2

 CATAHOULA checkmayte

cthulhu chewybac5 chesslife  CAJUNBOY

doobwah  Diana_L    

fanat  FHansen  FilipUser 

fullmetaldave  firestare500

gumpty  GrimReaper7752  gramos9956 

Hnsly   hmcgrier Hendrik77  Hellblazer 

isaac_jay

jdthompson   Jythier JPF917 Jackleg 

Knightguy KedDuff

LOB  laconian   

MainStreet  Mebeme muggles

 Muspelheim

Mad_dog_96 Maximus_Minimus

MBickley MolotovRuss  Mm40 

 michaelmcrobert  MARJAY

ntrafer  NeuroGuy  Nane

 Olimar

 pdmura     pawnsolo2

qtsii 

Rael RandellC  robert63 rocketman8

roundtuit rooknite rubycon 

shiggsyo spurg  starwraith  Sojkicz

strunk  shuttlechess92  Sparta spieler1

Upabushtrack  Unbeliever

wbsimms   WVSFielding

76 84


The distinction between User and Non-User is on the basis of these COT guidelines:  

NON-USERS "... play "over the board" chess, as if we were playing face to face, and unable to use analysis boards, opening books, or any other external aid to help us, we promised we would use our knowledge and experience only to play the game."   ( http://circleoftrust.bravehost.com/ )   

USERS use any or all legitimate facilities while playing the game. This EXCLUDES Chess Engines (such as Fritz) and Endgame Tablebases. (chess.com playing rules)

Counted up to (and including) post #731.


MainStreet

Per Artfizz's Standings:

As of 9/30/08:

Users - 76, Non-Users - 84

Thanks, Art.

OckhamsRazor

I've looked at the chess openings database here at chess.com once in a while, but honestly, it offers no solid conclusions, so I just stick to standard opening theory when I can.

 

Look at my chess.com rating.  I can't seem to stick to it very often :)

MainStreet
Evil_Homer wrote:
MainStreet wrote:
OckhamsRazor wrote:

I've looked at the chess openings database here at chess.com once in a while, but honestly, it offers no solid conclusions, so I just stick to standard opening theory when I can.

 

Look at my chess.com rating.  I can't seem to stick to it very often :)


As of 9/30/08:

Users - 76, Non-Users - 85


That's a spurious addition to the right!


As of 9/30/08:

Users - 77, Non-Users - 84

Dahan

OK, here's me. I use the analysis board whenever I feel the need. Just makes sense with correspondence chess. If you were playing it the old fashioned way, wouldn't you have a board set up? Would you be playing "touch"? 

As far as the rest of it; I have, on occasion looked at the "my games" section at the start of a game to see what happened when I played something in the past. That's about it. I consider it about the same as looking back through your notes on past games. Seems justifiable to me.

artfizz

Can't seem to get away with anything these days.

MainStreet
Dahan wrote:

OK, here's me. I use the analysis board whenever I feel the need. Just makes sense with correspondence chess. If you were playing it the old fashioned way, wouldn't you have a board set up? Would you be playing "touch"? 

As far as the rest of it; I have, on occasion looked at the "my games" section at the start of a game to see what happened when I played something in the past. That's about it. I consider it about the same as looking back through your notes on past games. Seems justifiable to me.


 

As of 9/30/08:

Users - 78, Non-Users - 84

arigalt

Im Non-Users

but it will be a great tool to learn from databases or books.

MainStreet
arigalt wrote:

Im Non-Users

but it will be a great tool to learn from databases or books.


As of 9/30/08:

Users - 78, Non-Users - 85

maGGot_SOUP

Non User

Love to Improved my game as it is. Win or Lose

MainStreet
maGGot_SOUP wrote:

Non User

Love to Improved my game as it is. Win or Lose


As of 9/30/08:

Users - 78, Non-Users - 86

maGGot_SOUP

slight lead by Non-Users

Thijs

Wasn't there a poll on this subject earlier? Why not just check the results of that poll, instead of trying to get votes here?

MainStreet
ElGuero wrote:

Non-user.  CoT OtB!


As of 9/30/08:

Users - 78, Non-Users - 87

MainStreet
Phobetor wrote:

Wasn't there a poll on this subject earlier? Why not just check the results of that poll, instead of trying to get votes here?


This tally was the father of that poll.

MainStreet
Evil_Homer wrote:

Given the poll has 950 votes cast, it is now more representative than this tally.

In many ways the son has surpassed the father


An improvement of the human race? :))

And it shows Users - 34%, Non-Users - 44% Laughing,

the rest didn't know outside stuff nor opening databases. (Source: front page)

This tally shows Users - 47%, Non-Users - 53%.

Nf6

Non user

weir96

NON-user FTW!

MainStreet
Nf6 wrote:

Non user


As of 9/30/08:

Users - 78, Non-Users - 88

for a 47%, 53%

MainStreet
weir96 wrote:

NON-user FTW!


As of 9/30/08:

Users - 78, Non-Users - 89

for a 47%, 53%